This fixes PR 101230 where I had messed up and forgot that
invert_tree_comparison can return ERROR_MARK if the comparsion
is not invertable (floating point types).
Committed as obvious after a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu-gnu
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/101230
* fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Check
the return value of invert_tree_comparison.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/torture/pr101230-1.c: New test.
tree arg00 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0);
tree arg01 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1);
comp_code = invert_tree_comparison (comp_code, HONOR_NANS (arg00));
- tem = fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (loc, type, comp_code,
- arg00,
- arg01,
- op2, op1);
+ if (comp_code != ERROR_MARK)
+ tem = fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (loc, type, comp_code,
+ arg00,
+ arg01,
+ op2, op1);
if (tem)
return tem;
}
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fno-signed-zeros" } */
+
+
+double distance3d_sqr_pt4d_pt4d(void);
+
+int update_r_k_curr_cluster;
+void update_r_k(void) {
+ double curr_distance = distance3d_sqr_pt4d_pt4d();
+ for (int cluster; cluster; cluster++)
+ if (0 < curr_distance) {
+ curr_distance = 0;
+ update_r_k_curr_cluster = cluster;
+ }
+}