This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
static inline void cx231xx_set_model(struct cx231xx *dev)
{
- memcpy(&dev->board, &cx231xx_boards[dev->model], sizeof(dev->board));
+ dev->board = cx231xx_boards[dev->model];
}
/* Since cx231xx_pre_card_setup() requires a proper dev->model,
dev->name, video_device_node_name(dev->vdev));
/* Initialize VBI template */
- memcpy(&cx231xx_vbi_template, &cx231xx_video_template,
- sizeof(cx231xx_vbi_template));
+ cx231xx_vbi_template = cx231xx_video_template;
strcpy(cx231xx_vbi_template.name, "cx231xx-vbi");
/* Allocate and fill vbi video_device struct */