The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value
directly, but the same value was also being specified in the
dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it!
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
reg->frac_div_start_mid);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_HIGH_1,
reg->frac_div_start_high);
- pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, 0x40);
+ pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1,
+ reg->pll_lockdet_rate);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCK_DELAY, 0x06);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_CMODE, 0x10);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_CLOCK_INVERTERS,