Fix bogus "inline namespace cannot be reopened as non-inline" diagnostic to

just warn that the second declaration is missing the 'inline' keyword. This is
valid, and we shouldn't be suggesting otherwise.

llvm-svn: 282981

diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 58e8e00..a65cf97 100644 (file)
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -1142,10 +1142,9 @@ def warn_cxx14_compat_inline_variable : Warning<
   DefaultIgnore, InGroup<CXXPre1zCompat>;
 
 def warn_inline_namespace_reopened_noninline : Warning<
-  "inline namespace cannot be reopened as a non-inline namespace">;
+  "inline namespace reopened as a non-inline namespace">;
 def err_inline_namespace_mismatch : Error<
-  "%select{|non-}0inline namespace "
-  "cannot be reopened as %select{non-|}0inline">;
+  "non-inline namespace cannot be reopened as inline">;
 
 def err_unexpected_friend : Error<
   "friends can only be classes or functions">;

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 6c952e0..133f1f4 100644 (file)
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -8089,7 +8089,7 @@ static void DiagnoseNamespaceInlineMismatch(Sema &S, SourceLocation KeywordLoc,
     S.Diag(Loc, diag::warn_inline_namespace_reopened_noninline)
       << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(KeywordLoc, "inline ");
   else
-    S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_inline_namespace_mismatch) << *IsInline;
+    S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_inline_namespace_mismatch);
 
   S.Diag(PrevNS->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_definition);
   *IsInline = PrevNS->isInline();

diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/basic.namespace/namespace.def/p7.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/basic.namespace/namespace.def/p7.cpp
index f923623..39bed7d 100644 (file)
--- a/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/basic.namespace/namespace.def/p7.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/dcl.dcl/basic.namespace/namespace.def/p7.cpp
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
 
+// FIXME: We should probably suppress the warning on reopening an inline
+// namespace without the inline keyword if it's not the first opening of the
+// namespace in the file, because there's no risk of the inlineness differing
+// across TUs in that case.
+
 namespace NIL {} // expected-note {{previous definition}}
 inline namespace NIL {} // expected-error {{cannot be reopened as inline}}
 inline namespace IL {} // expected-note {{previous definition}}
-namespace IL {} // expected-warning{{inline namespace cannot be reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
+namespace IL {} // expected-warning{{inline namespace reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
 
 namespace {} // expected-note {{previous definition}}
 inline namespace {} // expected-error {{cannot be reopened as inline}}
 namespace X {
   inline namespace {} // expected-note {{previous definition}}
-  namespace {} // expected-warning {{cannot be reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
+  namespace {} // expected-warning {{inline namespace reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
 }