x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()

Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.

Fix the comment. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
index f9eb113..74b108e 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)
        tdcall
 
        /*
-        * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
+        * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
         * something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module.
         *
         * The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate