While debugging on SA11x0, the following message was observed:
"Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state 20)"
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
allowed to. Or should we return -EAGAIN, because the upper layers
ought to have already shut down anything which was using the device
anyway? The latter for now. */
- printk(KERN_NOTICE "Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state %d)\n", chip->oldstate);
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE "Flash device refused suspend due to active operation (state %d)\n", chip->state);
ret = -EAGAIN;
case FL_PM_SUSPENDED:
break;