-2002-04-11 Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
-
- * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Don't try to unify an implicit typedef
- with an explicit one.
- (lookup_tag): Extract the tag of an explicit typedef.
-
2002-04-10 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/5507
}
}
- /* Do not merge an implicit typedef with an explicit one. In:
-
- class A;
- ...
- typedef class A A __attribute__ ((foo));
-
- the attribute should apply only to the typedef. */
- if (TREE_CODE (olddecl) == TYPE_DECL
- && (DECL_IMPLICIT_TYPEDEF_P (olddecl)
- || DECL_IMPLICIT_TYPEDEF_P (newdecl)))
- return 0;
-
/* If new decl is `static' and an `extern' was seen previously,
warn about it. */
warn_extern_redeclared_static (newdecl, olddecl);
else
old = BINDING_TYPE (old);
- /* If the declaration has an original type, it must a
- typedef. When it is an explicit typedef of the form:
-
- typedef struct A A;
-
- the original type will be the tag that we want.
- We should not return any other kind of typedef.
-
- Detect the valid case by checking that the original
- type has the same name and context as the typedef. */
+ /* If it has an original type, it is a typedef, and we
+ should not return it. */
if (old && DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (TYPE_NAME (old)))
- {
- old = DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (TYPE_NAME (old));
- if (TYPE_IDENTIFIER (old) != name
- || context_for_name_lookup (TYPE_NAME (old)) != tail)
- old = NULL_TREE;
- }
+ old = NULL_TREE;
if (old && TREE_CODE (old) != form
&& (form == ENUMERAL_TYPE || TREE_CODE (old) == ENUMERAL_TYPE))
{
-2002-04-11 Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
-
- * g++.dg/ext/attrib5.C: New test.
-
2002-04-10 Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
* g77.f-torture/execute/6177.f: New test.
+++ /dev/null
-// There were two related problems here, depending on the vintage. At
-// one time:
-//
-// typedef struct A { ... } A __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
-//
-// would cause original_types to go into an infinite loop. At other
-// times, the attributes applied to an explicit typedef would be lost
-// (check_b2 would have a negative size).
-
-// First check that the declaration is accepted and has an effect.
-typedef struct A { int i; } A __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
-int check_A[__alignof__ (A) >= 16 ? 1 : -1];
-
-// Check that the alignment is only applied to the typedef.
-struct B { int i; };
-namespace N { typedef B B; };
-typedef struct B B __attribute__((aligned (16)));
-N::B b1;
-B b2;
-int check_b1[__alignof__ (b1) == __alignof__ (int) ? 1 : -1];
-int check_b2[__alignof__ (b2) >= 16 ? 1 : -1];
-
-// The fix for this case involved a change to lookup_tag. This
-// bit just checks against a possible regression.
-namespace N { struct C; };
-typedef struct N::C C; // { dg-error "previous declaration" }
-struct C; // { dg-error "conflicting types" }