*/
WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT = 1 << 7,
+ __WQ_DESTROYING = 1 << 15, /* internal: workqueue is destroying */
__WQ_DRAINING = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
__WQ_ORDERED = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
__WQ_LEGACY = 1 << 18, /* internal: create*_workqueue() */
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
- /* if draining, only works from the same workqueue are allowed */
- if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) &&
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
+ /*
+ * For a draining wq, only works from the same workqueue are
+ * allowed. The __WQ_DESTROYING helps to spot the issue that
+ * queues a new work item to a wq after destroy_workqueue(wq).
+ */
+ if (unlikely(wq->flags & (__WQ_DESTROYING | __WQ_DRAINING) &&
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq))))
return;
rcu_read_lock();
retry:
*/
workqueue_sysfs_unregister(wq);
+ /* mark the workqueue destruction is in progress */
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ wq->flags |= __WQ_DESTROYING;
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+
/* drain it before proceeding with destruction */
drain_workqueue(wq);