Fix binding of nodes in case of forEach..() matchers.
authorDaniel Jasper <djasper@google.com>
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:14:55 +0000 (22:14 +0000)
committerDaniel Jasper <djasper@google.com>
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:14:55 +0000 (22:14 +0000)
When recursively visiting the generated matches, the aggregated bindings need
to be copied during the recursion. Otherwise, we they might not be properly
overwritten (which is shown by the test), or there might be bound nodes present
that were bound on a different matching branch.

Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D112
llvm-svn: 167695

clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersInternal.h
clang/lib/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersInternal.cpp
clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.cpp
clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.h

index 7bcf90f..e5365ff 100644 (file)
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ public:
 private:
   void visitMatchesRecursively(
       Visitor* ResultVistior,
-      BoundNodesMap *AggregatedBindings);
+      const BoundNodesMap& AggregatedBindings);
 
   // FIXME: Find out whether we want to use different data structures here -
   // first benchmarks indicate that it doesn't matter though.
index e7ee8ee..408195d 100644 (file)
@@ -51,19 +51,20 @@ void BoundNodesTree::copyTo(BoundNodesTreeBuilder* Builder) const {
 
 void BoundNodesTree::visitMatches(Visitor* ResultVisitor) {
   BoundNodesMap AggregatedBindings;
-  visitMatchesRecursively(ResultVisitor, &AggregatedBindings);
+  visitMatchesRecursively(ResultVisitor, AggregatedBindings);
 }
 
 void BoundNodesTree::
 visitMatchesRecursively(Visitor* ResultVisitor,
-                        BoundNodesMap* AggregatedBindings) {
-  Bindings.copyTo(AggregatedBindings);
+                        const BoundNodesMap& AggregatedBindings) {
+  BoundNodesMap CombinedBindings(AggregatedBindings);
+  Bindings.copyTo(&CombinedBindings);
   if (RecursiveBindings.empty()) {
-    ResultVisitor->visitMatch(BoundNodes(*AggregatedBindings));
+    ResultVisitor->visitMatch(BoundNodes(CombinedBindings));
   } else {
     for (unsigned I = 0; I < RecursiveBindings.size(); ++I) {
       RecursiveBindings[I].visitMatchesRecursively(ResultVisitor,
-                                                   AggregatedBindings);
+                                                   CombinedBindings);
     }
   }
 }
index ad54693..e15940a 100644 (file)
@@ -2775,6 +2775,17 @@ TEST(ForEachDescendant, BindsRecursiveCombinations) {
       new VerifyIdIsBoundTo<FieldDecl>("f", 8)));
 }
 
+TEST(ForEachDescendant, BindsCorrectNodes) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matchAndVerifyResultTrue(
+      "class C { void f(); int i; };",
+      recordDecl(hasName("C"), forEachDescendant(decl().bind("decl"))),
+      new VerifyIdIsBoundTo<FieldDecl>("decl", 1)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(matchAndVerifyResultTrue(
+      "class C { void f() {} int i; };",
+      recordDecl(hasName("C"), forEachDescendant(decl().bind("decl"))),
+      new VerifyIdIsBoundTo<FunctionDecl>("decl", 1)));
+}
+
 
 TEST(IsTemplateInstantiation, MatchesImplicitClassTemplateInstantiation) {
   // Make sure that we can both match the class by name (::X) and by the type
index 5e63b6b..3b23ada 100644 (file)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ public:
 
   virtual void run(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
     if (FindResultReviewer != NULL) {
-      *Verified = FindResultReviewer->run(&Result.Nodes, Result.Context);
+      *Verified |= FindResultReviewer->run(&Result.Nodes, Result.Context);
     } else {
       *Verified = true;
     }