ralloc: don't memset ralloc_header, clear it manually

time GALLIUM_NOOP=1 ./run shaders/private/alien_isolation/ >/dev/null

Before (2 takes):

real    0m8.734s    0m8.773s
user    0m34.232s   0m34.348s
sys     0m0.084s    0m0.056s

After (2 takes):

real    0m8.448s    0m8.463s
user    0m33.104s   0m33.160s
sys     0m0.088s    0m0.076s

Average change in "real" time spent: -3.4%

calloc should only do 2 things compared to malloc:
- check for overflow of "n * size"
- call memset
I'm not sure if that explains the difference.

v2: clear "parent" and "next" in the caller of add_child.

Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <funfunctor@folklore1984.net> (v1)
Tested-by: Edmondo Tommasina <edmondo.tommasina@gmail.com> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com> (v1)

diff --git a/src/util/ralloc.c b/src/util/ralloc.c
index 9526011..7023d79 100644 (file)
--- a/src/util/ralloc.c
+++ b/src/util/ralloc.c
@@ -122,13 +122,27 @@ ralloc_size(const void *ctx, size_t size)
 void *
 rzalloc_size(const void *ctx, size_t size)
 {
-   void *block = calloc(1, size + sizeof(ralloc_header));
+   void *block = malloc(size + sizeof(ralloc_header));
    ralloc_header *info;
    ralloc_header *parent;
 
    if (unlikely(block == NULL))
       return NULL;
+
    info = (ralloc_header *) block;
+   /* measurements have shown that calloc is slower (because of
+    * the multiplication overflow checking?), so clear things
+    * manually
+    */
+   info->parent = NULL;
+   info->child = NULL;
+   info->prev = NULL;
+   info->next = NULL;
+   info->destructor = NULL;
+
+   /* memset the allocation except for ralloc_header */
+   memset(&info[1], 0, size);
+
    parent = ctx != NULL ? get_header(ctx) : NULL;
 
    add_child(parent, info);