More statuses, a new patch, too

llvm-svn: 317074

diff --git a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
index eb53a83..2723c8b 100644 (file)
--- a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
+++ b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@
 
 <div id="content">
   <!--*********************************************************************-->
-  <h1>libc++ Issaquah Status</h1>
+  <h1>libc++ Upcoming Metting Status</h1>
   <!--*********************************************************************-->
 
   <p>This is a temporary page; please check the c++1z status <a href="cxx1z_status.html">here</a></p>
-  <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to be adopted in Toronto.</p>
+  <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to be adopted in the next WG21 Meeting.</p>
 
   <p>The groups that have contributed papers:
   <ul>
@@ -62,12 +62,12 @@
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2779">2779</a></td><td>[networking.ts] Relax requirements on buffer sequence iterators</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2870">2870</a></td><td>Default value of parameter theta of polar should be dependent</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2935">2935</a></td><td>What should create_directories do when p already exists but is not a directory?</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2941">2941</a></td><td>§[thread.req.timing] wording should apply to both member and namespace-level functions</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2944">2944</a></td><td>LWG 2905 accidentally removed requirement that construction of the deleter doesn't throw an exception</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2945">2945</a></td><td>Order of template parameters in optional comparisons</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2941">2941</a></td><td>[thread.req.timing] wording should apply to both member and namespace-level functions</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2944">2944</a></td><td>LWG 2905 accidentally removed requirement that construction of the deleter doesn't throw an exception</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2945">2945</a></td><td>Order of template parameters in optional comparisons</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2948">2948</a></td><td>unique_ptr does not define operator<< for stream output</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2950">2950</a></td><td>std::byte operations are misspecified</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2952">2952</a></td><td>iterator_traits should work for pointers to cv T</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2952">2952</a></td><td>iterator_traits should work for pointers to cv T</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2953">2953</a></td><td>LWG 2853 should apply to deque::erase too</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2964">2964</a></td><td>Apparently redundant requirement for dynamic_pointer_cast</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2965">2965</a></td><td>Non-existing path::native_string() in filesystem_error::what() specification</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2982">2982</a></td><td>Making size_type consistent in associative container deduction guides</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2988">2988</a></td><td>Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2993">2993</a></td><td>reference_wrapper<T> conversion from T&&</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2998">2998</a></td><td>Requirements on function objects passed to {forward_,}list-specific algorithms</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2998">2998</a></td><td>Requirements on function objects passed to {forward_,}list-specific algorithms</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3001">3001</a></td><td>weak_ptr::element_type needs remove_extent_t</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3024">3024</a></td><td>variant's copies must be deleted instead of disabled via SFINAE</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
 
@@ -92,12 +92,12 @@
 <li>2779 - </li>
 <li>2870 - We already default to <tt>T(0)</tt>; but the PR says <tt>T()</tt>. Later - this makes no difference at all; since T has to be float/double/long double</li>
 <li>2935 - Eric? </li>
-<li>2941 - Looks like wording changes; need to check to be sure.</li>
-<li>2944 - Definitely just wording changes. </li>
-<li>2945 - Looks like we already do it; needs a close look to be sure.</li>
+<li>2941 - Wording cleanup; nothing to do.</li>
+<li>2944 - Wording cleanup; nothing to do. </li>
+<li>2945 - Synopsis was wrong; code was fine. <i>Fixed in r317063</i></li>
 <li>2948 - </li>
 <li>2950 - Patch ready</li>
-<li>2952 - </li>
+<li>2952 - Patch ready</li>
 <li>2953 - Probably just wording; check to be sure.</li>
 <li>2964 - At the very least, it needs a test.</li>
 <li>2965 - Eric? </li>