}
}
+static void btf_dump_drop_mods(struct btf_dump *d, struct id_stack *decl_stack)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *t;
+ __u32 id;
+
+ while (decl_stack->cnt) {
+ id = decl_stack->ids[decl_stack->cnt - 1];
+ t = btf__type_by_id(d->btf, id);
+ if (!btf_is_mod(t))
+ return;
+ decl_stack->cnt--;
+ }
+}
+
static void btf_dump_emit_name(const struct btf_dump *d,
const char *name, bool last_was_ptr)
{
* a const/volatile modifier for array, so we are
* going to silently skip them here.
*/
- while (decls->cnt) {
- next_id = decls->ids[decls->cnt - 1];
- next_t = btf__type_by_id(d->btf, next_id);
- if (btf_is_mod(next_t))
- decls->cnt--;
- else
- break;
- }
+ btf_dump_drop_mods(d, decls);
if (decls->cnt == 0) {
btf_dump_emit_name(d, fname, last_was_ptr);
__u16 vlen = btf_vlen(t);
int i;
- btf_dump_emit_mods(d, decls);
+ /*
+ * GCC emits extra volatile qualifier for
+ * __attribute__((noreturn)) function pointers. Clang
+ * doesn't do it. It's a GCC quirk for backwards
+ * compatibility with code written for GCC <2.5. So,
+ * similarly to extra qualifiers for array, just drop
+ * them, instead of handling them.
+ */
+ btf_dump_drop_mods(d, decls);
if (decls->cnt) {
btf_dump_printf(d, " (");
btf_dump_emit_type_chain(d, decls, fname, lvl);