SUNRPC: The transmitted message must lie in the RPCSEC window of validity
authorTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:50:21 +0000 (13:50 -0400)
committerTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:35:13 +0000 (15:35 -0400)
If a message has been encoded using RPCSEC_GSS, the server is
maintaining a window of sequence numbers that it considers valid.
The client should normally be tracking that window, and needs to
verify that the sequence number used by the message being transmitted
still lies inside the window of validity.

So far, we've been able to assume this condition would be realised
automatically, since the client has been encoding the message only
after taking the socket lock. Once we change that condition, we
will need the explicit check.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
include/linux/sunrpc/auth_gss.h
net/sunrpc/auth.c
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
net/sunrpc/clnt.c
net/sunrpc/xprt.c

index 58a6765..2c97a39 100644 (file)
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct rpc_credops {
        int                     (*crkey_timeout)(struct rpc_cred *);
        bool                    (*crkey_to_expire)(struct rpc_cred *);
        char *                  (*crstringify_acceptor)(struct rpc_cred *);
+       bool                    (*crneed_reencode)(struct rpc_task *);
 };
 
 extern const struct rpc_authops        authunix_ops;
@@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ __be32 *            rpcauth_marshcred(struct rpc_task *, __be32 *);
 __be32 *               rpcauth_checkverf(struct rpc_task *, __be32 *);
 int                    rpcauth_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, kxdreproc_t encode, void *rqstp, __be32 *data, void *obj);
 int                    rpcauth_unwrap_resp(struct rpc_task *task, kxdrdproc_t decode, void *rqstp, __be32 *data, void *obj);
+bool                   rpcauth_xmit_need_reencode(struct rpc_task *task);
 int                    rpcauth_refreshcred(struct rpc_task *);
 void                   rpcauth_invalcred(struct rpc_task *);
 int                    rpcauth_uptodatecred(struct rpc_task *);
index 0c9eac3..30427b7 100644 (file)
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct gss_cl_ctx {
        refcount_t              count;
        enum rpc_gss_proc       gc_proc;
        u32                     gc_seq;
+       u32                     gc_seq_xmit;
        spinlock_t              gc_seq_lock;
        struct gss_ctx          *gc_gss_ctx;
        struct xdr_netobj       gc_wire_ctx;
index 305ecea..59df5cd 100644 (file)
@@ -817,6 +817,16 @@ rpcauth_unwrap_resp(struct rpc_task *task, kxdrdproc_t decode, void *rqstp,
        return rpcauth_unwrap_req_decode(decode, rqstp, data, obj);
 }
 
+bool
+rpcauth_xmit_need_reencode(struct rpc_task *task)
+{
+       struct rpc_cred *cred = task->tk_rqstp->rq_cred;
+
+       if (!cred || !cred->cr_ops->crneed_reencode)
+               return false;
+       return cred->cr_ops->crneed_reencode(task);
+}
+
 int
 rpcauth_refreshcred(struct rpc_task *task)
 {
index 21c0aa0..c898a7c 100644 (file)
@@ -1984,6 +1984,46 @@ gss_unwrap_req_decode(kxdrdproc_t decode, struct rpc_rqst *rqstp,
        return decode(rqstp, &xdr, obj);
 }
 
+static bool
+gss_seq_is_newer(u32 new, u32 old)
+{
+       return (s32)(new - old) > 0;
+}
+
+static bool
+gss_xmit_need_reencode(struct rpc_task *task)
+{
+       struct rpc_rqst *req = task->tk_rqstp;
+       struct rpc_cred *cred = req->rq_cred;
+       struct gss_cl_ctx *ctx = gss_cred_get_ctx(cred);
+       u32 win, seq_xmit;
+       bool ret = true;
+
+       if (!ctx)
+               return true;
+
+       if (gss_seq_is_newer(req->rq_seqno, READ_ONCE(ctx->gc_seq)))
+               goto out;
+
+       seq_xmit = READ_ONCE(ctx->gc_seq_xmit);
+       while (gss_seq_is_newer(req->rq_seqno, seq_xmit)) {
+               u32 tmp = seq_xmit;
+
+               seq_xmit = cmpxchg(&ctx->gc_seq_xmit, tmp, req->rq_seqno);
+               if (seq_xmit == tmp) {
+                       ret = false;
+                       goto out;
+               }
+       }
+
+       win = ctx->gc_win;
+       if (win > 0)
+               ret = !gss_seq_is_newer(req->rq_seqno, seq_xmit - win);
+out:
+       gss_put_ctx(ctx);
+       return ret;
+}
+
 static int
 gss_unwrap_resp(struct rpc_task *task,
                kxdrdproc_t decode, void *rqstp, __be32 *p, void *obj)
@@ -2052,6 +2092,7 @@ static const struct rpc_credops gss_credops = {
        .crunwrap_resp          = gss_unwrap_resp,
        .crkey_timeout          = gss_key_timeout,
        .crstringify_acceptor   = gss_stringify_acceptor,
+       .crneed_reencode        = gss_xmit_need_reencode,
 };
 
 static const struct rpc_credops gss_nullops = {
index 4f1ec80..d41b5ac 100644 (file)
@@ -2184,6 +2184,9 @@ call_status(struct rpc_task *task)
                /* shutdown or soft timeout */
                rpc_exit(task, status);
                break;
+       case -EBADMSG:
+               task->tk_action = call_transmit;
+               break;
        default:
                if (clnt->cl_chatty)
                        printk("%s: RPC call returned error %d\n",
index 6aa09ed..3973e10 100644 (file)
@@ -1014,6 +1014,13 @@ void xprt_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
        dprintk("RPC: %5u xprt_transmit(%u)\n", task->tk_pid, req->rq_slen);
 
        if (!req->rq_reply_bytes_recvd) {
+
+               /* Verify that our message lies in the RPCSEC_GSS window */
+               if (!req->rq_bytes_sent && rpcauth_xmit_need_reencode(task)) {
+                       task->tk_status = -EBADMSG;
+                       return;
+               }
+
                if (list_empty(&req->rq_list) && rpc_reply_expected(task)) {
                        /*
                         * Add to the list only if we're expecting a reply