net/smc: fix refcounting for non-blocking connect()
authorUrsula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:41:26 +0000 (12:41 +0100)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Wed, 30 Oct 2019 01:09:50 +0000 (18:09 -0700)
If a nonblocking socket is immediately closed after connect(),
the connect worker may not have started. This results in a refcount
problem, since sock_hold() is called from the connect worker.
This patch moves the sock_hold in front of the connect worker
scheduling.

Reported-by: syzbot+4c063e6dea39e4b79f29@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 50717a37db03 ("net/smc: nonblocking connect rework")
Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/smc/af_smc.c

index cea3c36ea0da6ed07d9375a0e1ac4dd27317132b..47946f489fd4f4a7bfb771a4062d962b818670ca 100644 (file)
@@ -707,8 +707,6 @@ static int __smc_connect(struct smc_sock *smc)
        int smc_type;
        int rc = 0;
 
-       sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
-
        if (smc->use_fallback)
                return smc_connect_fallback(smc, smc->fallback_rsn);
 
@@ -853,6 +851,8 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
        rc = kernel_connect(smc->clcsock, addr, alen, flags);
        if (rc && rc != -EINPROGRESS)
                goto out;
+
+       sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
        if (flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
                if (schedule_work(&smc->connect_work))
                        smc->connect_nonblock = 1;