This is a proposal to revert commit
914eedcb9ba0ff53c33808.
I found this when writing a simple UFFDIO_API test to be the first unit
test in this set. Two things breaks with the commit:
- UFFDIO_API check was lost and missing. According to man page, the
kernel should reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if uffdio_api.api != 0xaa. This
check is needed if the api version will be extended in the future, or
user app won't be able to identify which is a new kernel.
- Feature flags checks were removed, which means UFFDIO_API with a
feature that does not exist will also succeed. According to the man
page, we should (and it makes sense) to reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if
unknown features passed in.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220722201513.1624158-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412163922.327282-2-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes:
914eedcb9ba0 ("userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ret = -EFAULT;
if (copy_from_user(&uffdio_api, buf, sizeof(uffdio_api)))
goto out;
- /* Ignore unsupported features (userspace built against newer kernel) */
- features = uffdio_api.features & UFFD_API_FEATURES;
+ features = uffdio_api.features;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API || (features & ~UFFD_API_FEATURES))
+ goto err_out;
ret = -EPERM;
if ((features & UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK) && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
goto err_out;