[PATCH] ppc64: fix up()/down() usage for kprobe_mutex

The incorrect kprobe_mutex usage on x86_64 had percolated to ppc64 too.
First noticed by Yanmin Zhang.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c
index 7e80d49..9c6facc 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 
        /* insn must be on a special executable page on ppc64 */
        if (!ret) {
-               up(&kprobe_mutex);
-               p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
                down(&kprobe_mutex);
+               p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
+               up(&kprobe_mutex);
                if (!p->ainsn.insn)
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
        }
@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 
 void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
-       up(&kprobe_mutex);
-       free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn);
        down(&kprobe_mutex);
+       free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn);
+       up(&kprobe_mutex);
 }
 
 static inline void prepare_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)