cgroup: update cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() to grab siglock
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:29:31 +0000 (13:29 -0500)
committerJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:13:43 +0000 (17:13 +0100)
commit 532de3fc72adc2a6525c4d53c07bf81e1732083d upstream.

Currently, there's nothing preventing cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists()
from missing set PF_EXITING and race against cgroup_exit().  Depending
on the timing, cgroup_exit() may finish with the task still linked on
css_set leading to list corruption.  Fix it by grabbing siglock in
cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() so that PF_EXITING is guaranteed to be
visible.

This whole on-demand cg_list optimization is extremely fragile and has
ample possibility to lead to bugs which can cause things like
once-a-year oops during boot.  I'm wondering whether the better
approach would be just adding "cgroup_disable=all" handling which
disables the whole cgroup rather than tempting fate with this
on-demand craziness.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
kernel/cgroup.c

index a30c94b169bd1c04db2e8bffe351742a6bf89545..c4f8bc79d075da8845bdf7d5395cc78c5d0cdec9 100644 (file)
@@ -3017,9 +3017,14 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void)
                 * We should check if the process is exiting, otherwise
                 * it will race with cgroup_exit() in that the list
                 * entry won't be deleted though the process has exited.
+                * Do it while holding siglock so that we don't end up
+                * racing against cgroup_exit().
                 */
+               spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
                if (!(p->flags & PF_EXITING) && list_empty(&p->cg_list))
                        list_add(&p->cg_list, &task_css_set(p)->tasks);
+               spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
+
                task_unlock(p);
        } while_each_thread(g, p);
        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);