/**
* union security_list_options - Linux Security Module hook function list
*
- * Security hooks for Unix domain networking.
- *
- * @unix_stream_connect:
- * Check permissions before establishing a Unix domain stream connection
- * between @sock and @other.
- * @sock contains the sock structure.
- * @other contains the peer sock structure.
- * @newsk contains the new sock structure.
- * Return 0 if permission is granted.
- * @unix_may_send:
- * Check permissions before connecting or sending datagrams from @sock to
- * @other.
- * @sock contains the socket structure.
- * @other contains the peer socket structure.
- * Return 0 if permission is granted.
- *
- * The @unix_stream_connect and @unix_may_send hooks were necessary because
- * Linux provides an alternative to the conventional file name space for Unix
- * domain sockets. Whereas binding and connecting to sockets in the file name
- * space is mediated by the typical file permissions (and caught by the mknod
- * and permission hooks in inode_security_ops), binding and connecting to
- * sockets in the abstract name space is completely unmediated. Sufficient
- * control of Unix domain sockets in the abstract name space isn't possible
- * using only the socket layer hooks, since we need to know the actual target
- * socket, which is not looked up until we are inside the af_unix code.
- *
* Security hooks for socket operations.
*
* @socket_create:
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
-
+/**
+ * security_unix_stream_connect() - Check if a AF_UNIX stream is allowed
+ * @sock: originating sock
+ * @other: peer sock
+ * @newsk: new sock
+ *
+ * Check permissions before establishing a Unix domain stream connection
+ * between @sock and @other.
+ *
+ * The @unix_stream_connect and @unix_may_send hooks were necessary because
+ * Linux provides an alternative to the conventional file name space for Unix
+ * domain sockets. Whereas binding and connecting to sockets in the file name
+ * space is mediated by the typical file permissions (and caught by the mknod
+ * and permission hooks in inode_security_ops), binding and connecting to
+ * sockets in the abstract name space is completely unmediated. Sufficient
+ * control of Unix domain sockets in the abstract name space isn't possible
+ * using only the socket layer hooks, since we need to know the actual target
+ * socket, which is not looked up until we are inside the af_unix code.
+ *
+ * Return: Returns 0 if permission is granted.
+ */
int security_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *sock, struct sock *other, struct sock *newsk)
{
return call_int_hook(unix_stream_connect, 0, sock, other, newsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_unix_stream_connect);
+/**
+ * security_unix_may_send() - Check if AF_UNIX socket can send datagrams
+ * @sock: originating sock
+ * @other: peer sock
+ *
+ * Check permissions before connecting or sending datagrams from @sock to
+ * @other.
+ *
+ * The @unix_stream_connect and @unix_may_send hooks were necessary because
+ * Linux provides an alternative to the conventional file name space for Unix
+ * domain sockets. Whereas binding and connecting to sockets in the file name
+ * space is mediated by the typical file permissions (and caught by the mknod
+ * and permission hooks in inode_security_ops), binding and connecting to
+ * sockets in the abstract name space is completely unmediated. Sufficient
+ * control of Unix domain sockets in the abstract name space isn't possible
+ * using only the socket layer hooks, since we need to know the actual target
+ * socket, which is not looked up until we are inside the af_unix code.
+ *
+ * Return: Returns 0 if permission is granted.
+ */
int security_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock, struct socket *other)
{
return call_int_hook(unix_may_send, 0, sock, other);