drm/amdkfd: fix random KFDSVMRangeTest.SetGetAttributesTest test failure
authorYifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@amd.com>
Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:01:05 +0000 (11:01 +0800)
committerAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:19:08 +0000 (15:19 -0400)
KFDSVMRangeTest.SetGetAttributesTest randomly fails in stress test.

Note: Google Test filter = KFDSVMRangeTest.*
[==========] Running 18 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 18 tests from KFDSVMRangeTest
[ RUN      ] KFDSVMRangeTest.BasicSystemMemTest
[       OK ] KFDSVMRangeTest.BasicSystemMemTest (30 ms)
[ RUN      ] KFDSVMRangeTest.SetGetAttributesTest
[          ] Get default atrributes
/home/yifan/brahma/libhsakmt/tests/kfdtest/src/KFDSVMRangeTest.cpp:154: Failure
Value of: expectedDefaultResults[i]
  Actual: 4294967295
Expected: outputAttributes[i].value
Which is: 0
/home/yifan/brahma/libhsakmt/tests/kfdtest/src/KFDSVMRangeTest.cpp:154: Failure
Value of: expectedDefaultResults[i]
  Actual: 4294967295
Expected: outputAttributes[i].value
Which is: 0
/home/yifan/brahma/libhsakmt/tests/kfdtest/src/KFDSVMRangeTest.cpp:152: Failure
Value of: expectedDefaultResults[i]
  Actual: 4
Expected: outputAttributes[i].type
Which is: 2
[          ] Setting/Getting atrributes
[  FAILED  ]

the root cause is that svm work queue has not finished when svm_range_get_attr is called, thus
some garbage svm interval tree data make svm_range_get_attr get wrong result. Flush work queue before
iterate svm interval tree.

Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c

index cffed40..ecc390c 100644 (file)
@@ -3030,6 +3030,14 @@ svm_range_get_attr(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
        pr_debug("svms 0x%p [0x%llx 0x%llx] nattr 0x%x\n", &p->svms, start,
                 start + size - 1, nattr);
 
+       /* Flush pending deferred work to avoid racing with deferred actions from
+        * previous memory map changes (e.g. munmap). Concurrent memory map changes
+        * can still race with get_attr because we don't hold the mmap lock. But that
+        * would be a race condition in the application anyway, and undefined
+        * behaviour is acceptable in that case.
+        */
+       flush_work(&p->svms.deferred_list_work);
+
        mmap_read_lock(mm);
        if (!svm_range_is_valid(mm, start, size)) {
                pr_debug("invalid range\n");