spi: spi-tegra20-sflash: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
authorMinghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:01:03 +0000 (11:01 +0000)
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:01:03 +0000 (14:01 +0100)
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220418110103.2558955-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c

index 2888d8a..220ee08 100644 (file)
@@ -486,10 +486,9 @@ static int tegra_sflash_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                        goto exit_pm_disable;
        }
 
-       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
+       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
        if (ret < 0) {
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pm runtime get failed, e = %d\n", ret);
-               pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
                goto exit_pm_disable;
        }
 
@@ -549,9 +548,8 @@ static int tegra_sflash_resume(struct device *dev)
        struct tegra_sflash_data *tsd = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
        int ret;
 
-       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
        if (ret < 0) {
-               pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
                dev_err(dev, "pm runtime failed, e = %d\n", ret);
                return ret;
        }