Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02.
Below is a list of examples of prior fixes for these types of recursive issues;
-all errors appear to involve one or more select's and one or more "depends on".
+all errors appear to involve one or more "select" statements and one or more
+"depends on".
============ ===================================
commit fix
the deduced semantics matches our intended Kconfig design goals.
Having well defined semantics can be useful for tools for practical
-evaluation of depenencies, for instance one such use known case was work to
+evaluation of dependencies, for instance one such case was work to
express in boolean abstraction of the inferred semantics of Kconfig to
translate Kconfig logic into boolean formulas and run a SAT solver on this to
find dead code / features (always inactive), 114 dead features were found in
boolean formulas and run a SAT solver on it [5]_. Another known related project
is CADOS [6]_ (former VAMOS [7]_) and the tools, mainly undertaker [8]_, which
has been introduced first with [9]_. The basic concept of undertaker is to
-exract variability models from Kconfig, and put them together with a
+extract variability models from Kconfig and put them together with a
propositional formula extracted from CPP #ifdefs and build-rules into a SAT
solver in order to find dead code, dead files, and dead symbols. If using a SAT
solver is desirable on Kconfig one approach would be to evaluate repurposing