trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE
authorDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:12:01 +0000 (22:12 +0800)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:41:03 +0000 (12:41 +0100)
Use MAX_NICE instead of the value 19 for ring_buffer_benchmark.

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393251121-25534-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c

index a5457d5..0434ff1 100644 (file)
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static int write_iteration = 50;
 module_param(write_iteration, uint, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_iteration, "# of writes between timestamp readings");
 
-static int producer_nice = 19;
-static int consumer_nice = 19;
+static int producer_nice = MAX_NICE;
+static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE;
 
 static int producer_fifo = -1;
 static int consumer_fifo = -1;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 
        /* Let the user know that the test is running at low priority */
        if (producer_fifo < 0 && consumer_fifo < 0 &&
-           producer_nice == 19 && consumer_nice == 19)
+           producer_nice == MAX_NICE && consumer_nice == MAX_NICE)
                trace_printk("WARNING!!! This test is running at lowest priority.\n");
 
        trace_printk("Time:     %lld (usecs)\n", time);