return false;
}
- // Try to read at least 8192 bytes to avoid to many small reads.
- const size_t kMinSizeToRead = 8192;
- const size_t sizeRequested = newSize - fStreamBuffer.bytesWritten();
- const size_t sizeToRead = SkTMax(kMinSizeToRead, sizeRequested);
- SkAutoSTMalloc<kMinSizeToRead, uint8> tempBuffer(sizeToRead);
+ const size_t sizeToRead = newSize - fStreamBuffer.bytesWritten();
+ SkAutoTMalloc<uint8> tempBuffer(sizeToRead);
const size_t bytesRead = fStream->read(tempBuffer.get(), sizeToRead);
- if (bytesRead < sizeRequested) {
+ if (bytesRead != sizeToRead) {
return false;
}
return fStreamBuffer.write(tempBuffer.get(), bytesRead);
SkCodec* SkRawCodec::NewFromStream(SkStream* stream) {
SkAutoTDelete<SkRawStream> rawStream(new SkRawStream(stream));
::piex::PreviewImageData imageData;
+ // FIXME: ::piex::GetPreviewImageData() calls GetData() frequently with small amounts,
+ // resulting in many calls to bufferMoreData(). Could we make this more efficient by grouping
+ // smaller requests together?
if (::piex::IsRaw(rawStream.get())) {
::piex::Error error = ::piex::GetPreviewImageData(rawStream.get(), &imageData);