ssb: sprom: fix block comments coding style issues

Fixed coding style issues

Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.oldman@polehill.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200424175043.16261-1-john.oldman@polehill.co.uk

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
index 52d2e0f..42d620c 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_show(struct ssb_bus *bus, char *buf,
 
        /* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
         * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
-        * to cancel operation. */
+        * to cancel operation.
+        */
        err = -ERESTARTSYS;
        if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
                goto out_kfree;
@@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 
        /* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
         * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
-        * to cancel operation. */
+        * to cancel operation.
+        */
        err = -ERESTARTSYS;
        if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
                goto out_kfree;
@@ -188,9 +190,11 @@ int ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out)
 bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 {
        /* status register only exists on chipcomon rev >= 11 and we need check
-          for >= 31 only */
+        * for >= 31 only
+        */
        /* this routine differs from specs as we do not access SPROM directly
-          on PCMCIA */
+        * on PCMCIA
+        */
        if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI &&
            bus->chipco.dev &&  /* can be unavailable! */
            bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31)