omap: sram: fix is_sram_locked check
authorVikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:49:24 +0000 (18:19 +0530)
committerSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:00:17 +0000 (11:30 +0530)
For OMAP24xx/34xx/44xx: omap_type() returns the correct type:
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_TEST
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_EMU
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_SEC
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_BAD

In current implementation there are two problems:
Problem 1:
For 34xx, the current if check will never return true.

Problem 2:
For 24xx the correct type check should be with omap_type() function
Verified by checking the TRM 24xx for CONTROL_STATUS register bits

Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c

index 226b2e8..112b807 100644 (file)
@@ -93,16 +93,7 @@ extern unsigned long omapfb_reserve_sram(unsigned long sram_pstart,
  */
 static int is_sram_locked(void)
 {
-       int type = 0;
-
-       if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
-               /* Not yet supported */
-               return 0;
-
-       if (cpu_is_omap242x())
-               type = omap_rev() & OMAP2_DEVICETYPE_MASK;
-
-       if (type == GP_DEVICE) {
+       if (OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP == omap_type()) {
                /* RAMFW: R/W access to all initiators for all qualifier sets */
                if (cpu_is_omap242x()) {
                        __raw_writel(0xFF, OMAP24XX_VA_REQINFOPERM0); /* all q-vects */