+2007-02-21 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ * elf.c (_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments): If the
+ override_segment_assignment callback is defined then call it.
+
2007-02-21 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* elf32-spu.c (spu_elf_size_stubs): Correct order of warning args.
new_segment = FALSE;
}
+ /* Allow interested parties a chance to override our decision. */
+ if (last_hdr && info->callbacks->override_segment_assignment)
+ new_segment = info->callbacks->override_segment_assignment (info, abfd, hdr, last_hdr, new_segment);
+
if (! new_segment)
{
if ((hdr->flags & SEC_READONLY) == 0)
+2007-02-21 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ * bfdlink.h (struct bfd_link_callbacks): Add
+ override_segment_assignment field.
+
2007-02-17 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com
/* General link info message. */
void (*einfo)
(const char *fmt, ...);
+ /* This callback provides a chance for users of the BFD library to
+ override its decision about whether to place two adjacent sections
+ into the same segment. */
+ bfd_boolean (*override_segment_assignment)
+ (struct bfd_link_info *, bfd * abfd,
+ asection * current_section, asection * previous_section,
+ bfd_boolean new_segment);
};
\f
/* The linker builds link_order structures which tell the code how to
+2007-02-21 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ * ldlang.c (ldlang_override_segment_assignment): New function.
+ * ldlang.h (ldlang_override_segment_assignment): Prototype.
+ * ldmain.c (link_callbacks): Add
+ ldlang_override_segment_assignment.
+
2007-02-20 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* ldexp.c (fold_name <LOADADDR>): Ensure result is always absolute.
return dot;
}
+/* Callback routine that is used in _bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments. */
+
+bfd_boolean
+ldlang_override_segment_assignment (struct bfd_link_info * info ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ asection * current_section,
+ asection * previous_section,
+ bfd_boolean new_segment)
+{
+ lang_output_section_statement_type * cur;
+ lang_output_section_statement_type * prev;
+
+ if (new_segment)
+ return TRUE;
+
+ /* Paranoia checks. */
+ if (current_section == NULL || previous_section == NULL)
+ return new_segment;
+
+ /* Find the memory regions associated with the two sections.
+ We call lang_output_section_find() here rather than scanning the list
+ of output sections looking for a matching section pointer because if
+ we have a large number of sections a hash lookup is faster. */
+ cur = lang_output_section_find (current_section->name);
+ prev = lang_output_section_find (previous_section->name);
+
+ if (cur == NULL || prev == NULL)
+ return new_segment;
+
+ /* If the regions are different then force the sections to live in
+ different segments. See the email thread starting here for the
+ reasons why this is necessary:
+ http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-02/msg00216.html */
+ return cur->region != prev->region;
+}
+
void
one_lang_size_sections_pass (bfd_boolean *relax, bfd_boolean check_regions)
{
extern bfd_boolean load_symbols
(lang_input_statement_type *, lang_statement_list_type *);
+extern bfd_boolean
+ldlang_override_segment_assignment
+ (struct bfd_link_info *, bfd *, asection *, asection *, bfd_boolean);
+
#endif
reloc_dangerous,
unattached_reloc,
notice,
- einfo
+ einfo,
+ ldlang_override_segment_assignment
};
struct bfd_link_info link_info;