ClangTidyContext *Context)
: ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context),
NamespaceCommentPattern("^/[/*] *(end (of )?)? *(anonymous|unnamed)? *"
- "namespace( +([a-zA-Z0-9_]+))? *(\\*/)?$",
+ "namespace( +([a-zA-Z0-9_]+))?\\.? *(\\*/)?$",
llvm::Regex::IgnoreCase),
ShortNamespaceLines(Options.get("ShortNamespaceLines", 1u)),
SpacesBeforeComments(Options.get("SpacesBeforeComments", 1u)) {}
// Try to find existing namespace closing comment on the same line.
if (Tok.is(tok::comment) && NextTokenIsOnSameLine) {
StringRef Comment(Sources.getCharacterData(Loc), Tok.getLength());
- SmallVector<StringRef, 6> Groups;
+ SmallVector<StringRef, 7> Groups;
if (NamespaceCommentPattern.match(Comment, &Groups)) {
- StringRef NamespaceNameInComment = Groups.size() >= 6 ? Groups[5] : "";
+ StringRef NamespaceNameInComment = Groups.size() > 5 ? Groups[5] : "";
+ StringRef Anonymous = Groups.size() > 3 ? Groups[3] : "";
// Check if the namespace in the comment is the same.
if ((ND->isAnonymousNamespace() && NamespaceNameInComment.empty()) ||
- ND->getNameAsString() == NamespaceNameInComment) {
+ (ND->getNameAsString() == NamespaceNameInComment &&
+ Anonymous.empty())) {
// FIXME: Maybe we need a strict mode, where we always fix namespace
// comments with different format.
return;
"} // anonymous namespace",
runCheckOnCode<NamespaceCommentCheck>("namespace {\n"
"} // anonymous namespace"));
+ EXPECT_EQ("namespace {\n"
+ "} // Anonymous namespace.",
+ runCheckOnCode<NamespaceCommentCheck>("namespace {\n"
+ "} // Anonymous namespace."));
+ EXPECT_EQ("namespace q {\n"
+ "} // namespace q",
+ runCheckOnCode<NamespaceCommentCheck>("namespace q {\n"
+ "} // anonymous namespace q"));
EXPECT_EQ(
"namespace My_NameSpace123 {\n"
"} // namespace My_NameSpace123",