print FOO $a, " plus ", $b, " equals ", $a + $b, "\n";
print <FOO>;
+=head2 The C<untie> Gotcha
+
+If you intend making use of the object returned from either tie() or
+tied(), and if the tie's target class defines a destructor, there is a
+subtle gotcha you I<must> guard against.
+
+As setup, consider this (admittedly rather contrived) example of a
+tie; all it does is use a file to keep a log of the values assigned to
+a scalar.
+
+ package Remember;
+
+ use strict;
+ use IO::File;
+
+ sub TIESCALAR {
+ my $class = shift;
+ my $filename = shift;
+ my $handle = new IO::File "> $filename"
+ or die "Cannot open $filename: $!\n";
+
+ print $handle "The Start\n";
+ bless {FH => $handle, Value => 0}, $class;
+ }
+
+ sub FETCH {
+ my $self = shift;
+ return $self->{Value};
+ }
+
+ sub STORE {
+ my $self = shift;
+ my $value = shift;
+ my $handle = $self->{FH};
+ print $handle "$value\n";
+ $self->{Value} = $value;
+ }
+
+ sub DESTROY {
+ my $self = shift;
+ my $handle = $self->{FH};
+ print $handle "The End\n";
+ close $handle;
+ }
+
+ 1;
+
+Here is an example that makes use of this tie:
+
+ use strict;
+ use Remember;
+
+ my $fred;
+ tie $fred, 'Remember', 'myfile.txt';
+ $fred = 1;
+ $fred = 4;
+ $fred = 5;
+ untie $fred;
+ system "cat myfile.txt";
+
+This is the output when it is executed:
+
+ The Start
+ 1
+ 4
+ 5
+ The End
+
+So far so good. Those of you who have been paying attention will have
+spotted that the tied object hasn't been used so far. So lets add an
+extra method to the Remember class to allow comments to be included in
+the file -- say, something like this:
+
+ sub comment {
+ my $self = shift;
+ my $text = shift;
+ my $handle = $self->{FH};
+ print $handle $text, "\n";
+ }
+
+And here is the previous example modified to use the C<comment> method
+(which requires the tied object):
+
+ use strict;
+ use Remember;
+
+ my ($fred, $x);
+ $x = tie $fred, 'Remember', 'myfile.txt';
+ $fred = 1;
+ $fred = 4;
+ comment $x "changing...";
+ $fred = 5;
+ untie $fred;
+ system "cat myfile.txt";
+
+When this code is executed there is no output. Here's why:
+
+When a variable is tied, it is associated with the object which is the
+return value of the TIESCALAR, TIEARRAY, or TIEHASH function. This
+object normally has only one reference, namely, the implicit reference
+from the tied variable. When untie() is called, that reference is
+destroyed. Then, as in the first example above, the object's
+destructor (DESTROY) is called, which is normal for objects that have
+no more valid references; and thus the file is closed.
+
+In the second example, however, we have stored another reference to
+the tied object in C<$x>. That means that when untie() gets called
+there will still be a valid reference to the object in existence, so
+the destructor is not called at that time, and thus the file is not
+closed. The reason there is no output is because the file buffers
+have not been flushed to disk.
+
+Now that you know what the problem is, what can you do to avoid it?
+Well, the good old C<-w> flag will spot any instances where you call
+untie() and there are still valid references to the tied object. If
+the second script above is run with the C<-w> flag, Perl prints this
+warning message:
+
+ untie attempted while 1 inner references still exist
+
+To get the script to work properly and silence the warning make sure
+there are no valid references to the tied object I<before> untie() is
+called:
+
+ undef $x;
+ untie $fred;
+
=head1 SEE ALSO
See L<DB_File> or L<Config> for some interesting tie() implementations.