drm/auth: make drm_{set,drop}master_ioctl symmetrical
authorEmil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Sat, 30 May 2020 12:46:40 +0000 (13:46 +0100)
committerEmil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:49:50 +0000 (14:49 +0100)
Currently the ret handling is all over the place - with two redundant
assignments and another one addressed earlier.

Use the exact same flow in both functions.

v2: straighten the code flow, instead of just removing the assignments

Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200530124640.4176323-2-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c

index 4c723e3..f2d46b7 100644 (file)
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ drm_master_check_perm(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
 int drm_setmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                        struct drm_file *file_priv)
 {
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret;
 
        mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
 
@@ -272,12 +272,15 @@ int drm_dropmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
        if (ret)
                goto out_unlock;
 
-       ret = -EINVAL;
-       if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))
+       if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv)) {
+               ret = -EINVAL;
                goto out_unlock;
+       }
 
-       if (!dev->master)
+       if (!dev->master) {
+               ret = -EINVAL;
                goto out_unlock;
+       }
 
        if (file_priv->master->lessor != NULL) {
                DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Attempt to drop lessee %d as master\n", file_priv->master->lessee_id);
@@ -285,7 +288,6 @@ int drm_dropmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                goto out_unlock;
        }
 
-       ret = 0;
        drm_drop_master(dev, file_priv);
 out_unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex);