Historically, we used to track the "with-ness" of a scope differently; not
creating a with scope, but setting a property on the scope (see
https://codereview.chromium.org/5166006 ). For laziness decisions, checking the
with-ness should be unnecessary: the current scope is function scope, and if the
outer scope is global scope, there's surely no with scope in between.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/
209863004
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@20189
ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-
3dcde31c8c00
// Parse function body.
ScopeType outer_scope_type = scope_->type();
- bool inside_with = scope_->inside_with();
PreParserScope function_scope(scope_, FUNCTION_SCOPE);
FunctionState function_state(&function_state_, &scope_, &function_scope);
function_state.set_is_generator(is_generator);
// See Parser::ParseFunctionLiteral for more information about lazy parsing
// and lazy compilation.
- bool is_lazily_parsed = (outer_scope_type == GLOBAL_SCOPE &&
- !inside_with && allow_lazy() &&
+ bool is_lazily_parsed = (outer_scope_type == GLOBAL_SCOPE && allow_lazy() &&
!parenthesized_function_);
parenthesized_function_ = false;
public:
explicit PreParserScope(PreParserScope* outer_scope, ScopeType scope_type)
: scope_type_(scope_type) {
- if (outer_scope) {
- scope_inside_with_ = outer_scope->scope_inside_with_ || is_with_scope();
- strict_mode_ = outer_scope->strict_mode();
- } else {
- scope_inside_with_ = is_with_scope();
- strict_mode_ = SLOPPY;
- }
- }
-
- bool is_with_scope() const { return scope_type_ == WITH_SCOPE; }
- bool inside_with() const {
- return scope_inside_with_;
+ strict_mode_ = outer_scope ? outer_scope->strict_mode() : SLOPPY;
}
ScopeType type() { return scope_type_; }
private:
ScopeType scope_type_;
- bool scope_inside_with_;
StrictMode strict_mode_;
};