You'd think people know that the internal 100BASE-TX PHY on the SJA1110
responds only to clause 22 MDIO transactions, but they don't :)
When a clause 45 transaction is attempted, sja1105_base_tx_mdio_read()
and sja1105_base_tx_mdio_write() don't expect "reg" to contain bit 30
set (MII_ADDR_C45) and pack this value into the SPI transaction buffer.
But the field in the SPI buffer has a width smaller than 30 bits, so we
see this confusing message from the packing() API rather than a proper
rejection of C45 transactions:
Call trace:
dump_stack+0x1c/0x38
sja1105_pack+0xbc/0xc0 [sja1105]
sja1105_xfer+0x114/0x2b0 [sja1105]
sja1105_xfer_u32+0x44/0xf4 [sja1105]
sja1105_base_tx_mdio_read+0x44/0x7c [sja1105]
mdiobus_read+0x44/0x80
get_phy_c45_ids+0x70/0x234
get_phy_device+0x68/0x15c
fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy+0x74/0x240
of_mdiobus_register+0x13c/0x380
sja1105_mdiobus_register+0x368/0x490 [sja1105]
sja1105_setup+0x94/0x119c [sja1105]
Cannot store
401d2405 inside bits 24-4 (would truncate)
Fixes: 5a8f09748ee7 ("net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
u32 tmp;
int rc;
+ if (reg & MII_ADDR_C45)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
rc = sja1105_xfer_u32(priv, SPI_READ, regs->mdio_100base_tx + reg,
&tmp, NULL);
if (rc < 0)
const struct sja1105_regs *regs = priv->info->regs;
u32 tmp = val;
+ if (reg & MII_ADDR_C45)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
return sja1105_xfer_u32(priv, SPI_WRITE, regs->mdio_100base_tx + reg,
&tmp, NULL);
}