sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation() to ttwu_do_wakeup()
authorPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:23:56 +0000 (17:23 +0200)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:52:40 +0000 (08:52 +0200)
The ttwu_post_activation() code does the core wakeup, it sets TASK_RUNNING
and performs wakeup-preemption, so give is a more descriptive name.

Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110405152729.434609705@chello.nl
kernel/sched.c

index 5ec2e8b..e309dba 100644 (file)
@@ -2456,8 +2456,11 @@ static void ttwu_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
                wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Mark the task runnable and perform wakeup-preemption.
+ */
 static void
-ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
+ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
 {
        trace_sched_wakeup(p, true);
        check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
@@ -2562,7 +2565,7 @@ out_activate:
 
        ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP | ENQUEUE_WAKING);
 out_running:
-       ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
+       ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags);
        success = 1;
        __task_rq_unlock(rq);
 
@@ -2602,7 +2605,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
        if (!p->on_rq)
                ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
 
-       ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
+       ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0);
        ttwu_stat(p, smp_processor_id(), 0);
 out:
        raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock);