2004-03-17 David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>

	* gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of
	PR c++/826.

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 4f1377e..1dcd201 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2004-03-17  David Carlton  <carlton@kealia.com>
+
+       * gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of
+       PR c++/826.
+
 2004-03-16  Roland McGrath  <roland@redhat.com>
 
        * gdb.base/auxv.exp: New file.

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp
index 0b723e5..d4e78c1 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
     }
 
     # I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
-    # See PR gdb/826.
+    # See PR gdb/1588.
 
     gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
        -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
        -re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
            # "parse error" is bison 1.35.
            # "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
-           kfail "gdb/826" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
+           kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
        }
     }