wb_kupdate() function has a bug on linux-2.6.30-rc5. This bug causes
generic_sync_sb_inodes() to start to write inodes back much earlier than
our expectations because it miscalculates oldest_jif in wb_kupdate().
This bug was introduced in
704503d836042d4a4c7685b7036e7de0418fbc0f
('mm: fix proc_dointvec_userhz_jiffies "breakage"').
Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
/*
* The interval between `kupdate'-style writebacks
*/
-unsigned int dirty_writeback_interval = 5 * 100; /* sentiseconds */
+unsigned int dirty_writeback_interval = 5 * 100; /* centiseconds */
/*
* The longest time for which data is allowed to remain dirty
*/
-unsigned int dirty_expire_interval = 30 * 100; /* sentiseconds */
+unsigned int dirty_expire_interval = 30 * 100; /* centiseconds */
/*
* Flag that makes the machine dump writes/reads and block dirtyings.
sync_supers();
- oldest_jif = jiffies - msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval);
+ oldest_jif = jiffies - msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10);
start_jif = jiffies;
next_jif = start_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
nr_to_write = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +