Using bus numbers in migration is clearly wrong as
they are guest assigned. Not really sure what the
right thing to do is, for now stick 0 in there so things
keep working for non-nested setups, add a TODO.
We also probably have to mark nested bridges as non-migrateable
until this is fixed?
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
char path[16];
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x",
- pci_find_domain(d->bus), d->config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS],
+ pci_find_domain(d->bus),
+ 0 /* TODO: need a persistent path for nested buses.
+ * Note: pci_bus_num(d->bus) is not right as it's guest
+ * assigned. */,
PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
return strdup(path);