between them are shut down, the inverse of the start-up order
is applied. i.e. if a unit is configured with
<varname>After=</varname> on another unit, the former is
- stopped before the latter if both are shut down. If one unit
- with an ordering dependency on another unit is shut down while
- the latter is started up, the shut down is ordered before the
- start-up regardless of whether the ordering dependency is
- actually of type <varname>After=</varname> or
- <varname>Before=</varname>. If two units have no ordering
- dependencies between them, they are shut down or started up
- simultaneously, and no ordering takes place.
+ stopped before the latter if both are shut down. Given two units
+ with any ordering dependency between them, if one unit is shut
+ down and the other is started up, the shutdown is ordered
+ before the start-up. It doesn't matter if the ordering
+ dependency is <varname>After=</varname> or
+ <varname>Before=</varname>. It also doesn't matter which of the
+ two is shut down, as long as one is shut down and the other is
+ started up. The shutdown is ordered before the start-up in all
+ cases. If two units have no ordering dependencies between them,
+ they are shut down or started up simultaneously, and no ordering
+ takes place.
</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>