layed -> laid
adressing -> addressing
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
+2020-12-12 Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
+
+ * bpf_disasm.c (bswap_bpf_insn): Fix spelling typo in comment.
+ * i386_disasm.c (i386_disasm): Likewise.
+
2020-05-09 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
* i386_parse.y (new_bitfield): Call free newp on error.
bswap_bpf_insn (struct bpf_insn *p)
{
/* Note that the dst_reg and src_reg fields are 4-bit bitfields.
- That means these two nibbles are (typically) layed out in the
+ That means these two nibbles are (typically) laid out in the
opposite order between big- and little-endian hosts. This is
not required by any standard, but does happen to be true for
at least ppc, s390, arm and mips as big-endian hosts. */
}
/* We have a match. First determine how many bytes are
- needed for the adressing mode. */
+ needed for the addressing mode. */
param_start = codep;
if (instrtab[cnt].modrm)
{