A non-zero return code for H_REG_SUB_CRQ is currently treated as a failure
resulting in failing sub-CRQ setup. The case of H_CLOSED should not be
treated as a failure. This return code translates to a successful sub-CRQ
registration by the hypervisor, and is meant to communicate back that there
is currently no partner VIOS CRQ connection established as of yet. This is
a common occurrence during a disconnect where the client adapter can
possibly come back up prior to the partner adapter.
For non-zero return code from H_REG_SUB_CRQ treat a H_CLOSED as success so
that sub-CRQs are successfully setup.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210302230543.9905-4-tyreld@linux.ibm.com
Fixes: 3034ebe26389 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels")
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
rc = h_reg_sub_crq(vdev->unit_address, scrq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE,
&scrq->cookie, &scrq->hw_irq);
- if (rc) {
+ /* H_CLOSED indicates successful register, but no CRQ partner */
+ if (rc && rc != H_CLOSED) {
dev_warn(dev, "Error registering sub-crq: %d\n", rc);
if (rc == H_PARAMETER)
dev_warn_once(dev, "Firmware may not support MQ\n");