dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171657.GA25663@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
index 6e12685..c4ce5df 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ struct tegra_adma {
        const struct tegra_adma_chip_data *cdata;
 
        /* Last member of the structure */
-       struct tegra_adma_chan          channels[0];
+       struct tegra_adma_chan          channels[];
 };
 
 static inline void tdma_write(struct tegra_adma *tdma, u32 reg, u32 val)