perform a deep check. */
return structural_comptypes (t1, t2, strict);
- if (flag_checking && param_use_canonical_types)
- {
- bool result = structural_comptypes (t1, t2, strict);
-
- if (result && TYPE_CANONICAL (t1) != TYPE_CANONICAL (t2))
- /* The two types are structurally equivalent, but their
- canonical types were different. This is a failure of the
- canonical type propagation code.*/
- internal_error (
- "canonical types differ for identical types %qT and %qT", t1, t2);
- else if (!result && TYPE_CANONICAL (t1) == TYPE_CANONICAL (t2))
- /* Two types are structurally different, but the canonical
- types are the same. This means we were over-eager in
- assigning canonical types. */
- internal_error (
- "same canonical type node for different types %qT and %qT", t1,
- t2);
-
- return result;
- }
- if (!flag_checking && param_use_canonical_types)
+ if (!flag_checking)
return TYPE_CANONICAL (t1) == TYPE_CANONICAL (t2);
else
return structural_comptypes (t1, t2, strict);