Up to now, a new timeout value is only evaluated against min_timeout
if max_timeout is provided. This does not really make sense; a driver
can have a minimum timeout even if it does not have a maximum timeout.
Ensure that it is not smaller than min_timeout, even if max_timeout
is not set.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
/* Use the following function to check if a timeout value is invalid */
static inline bool watchdog_timeout_invalid(struct watchdog_device *wdd, unsigned int t)
{
- return ((wdd->max_timeout != 0) &&
- (t < wdd->min_timeout || t > wdd->max_timeout));
+ /*
+ * The timeout is invalid if
+ * - the requested value is smaller than the configured minimum timeout,
+ * or
+ * - a maximum timeout is configured, and the requested value is larger
+ * than the maximum timeout.
+ */
+ return t < wdd->min_timeout ||
+ (wdd->max_timeout && t > wdd->max_timeout);
}
/* Use the following functions to manipulate watchdog driver specific data */