In the comparison, both clang and GCC are popular and widely adopted. This is no...

This whole doc should really be looked at.

llvm-svn: 179040

diff --git a/clang/www/comparison.html b/clang/www/comparison.html
index e8b1492..afc321e 100644 (file)
--- a/clang/www/comparison.html
+++ b/clang/www/comparison.html
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li>
-    <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     </ul>
     
     <p>Pro's of clang vs GCC:</p>