re PR testsuite/35406 (gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c don...

2008-03-13  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR testsuite/35406
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c: Update expected scan match count from 0
	to 1.

From-SVN: r133207

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index d4b6271..bfb5d1a 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 2008-03-13  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
 
-       PR fortran/35406
+       PR testsuite/35406
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c: Update expected scan match count from 0
+       to 1.
+       
+2008-03-13  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+       PR testsuite/35406
        * gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90: Update test to check for 5 loops distributed
        instead of 4.
 

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c
index c9b1293..cb9451e 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ int loop1 (int k)
 
 /* We used to distribute also innermost loops, but these could produce
    too much code in the outer loop, degrading performance of scalar
-   code.  So this test is XFAILed because the cost model of the stand
-   alone distribution pass has evolved.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "distributed: split to 2 loops" 0 "ldist" } } */
+   code.  So this test was XFAILed because the cost model of the stand
+   alone distribution pass has evolved.  Now it passes.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "distributed: split to 2 loops" 1 "ldist" } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "ldist" } } */