PPCMCInstLower does not actually call shouldAssumeDSOLocal for ppc32 so this is dead.
Actually Clang ppc32 does produce a pair of absolute relocations which match GCC.
This also fixes a comment (R_PPC_COPY and R_PPC64_COPY do exist).
if (RM == llvm::Reloc::PIC_ && GV->hasExternalWeakLinkage())
return false;
- // PPC has no copy relocations and cannot use a plt entry as a symbol address.
- llvm::Triple::ArchType Arch = TT.getArch();
- if (Arch == llvm::Triple::ppc || Arch == llvm::Triple::ppc64 ||
- Arch == llvm::Triple::ppc64le)
+ // PowerPC64 prefers TOC indirection to avoid copy relocations.
+ if (TT.isPPC64())
return false;
// If we can use copy relocations we can assume it is local.
return false;
Triple::ArchType Arch = TT.getArch();
- // PowerPC prefers avoiding copy relocations.
- if (Arch == Triple::ppc || TT.isPPC64())
+ // PowerPC64 prefers TOC indirection to avoid copy relocations.
+ if (TT.isPPC64())
return false;
// dso_local is traditionally implied for Reloc::Static. Eventually we shall