The following testcase is miscompiled. We see the constructor is immediate,
in build_over_call we trigger:
if (obj_arg && is_dummy_object (obj_arg))
{
call = build_cplus_new (DECL_CONTEXT (fndecl), call, complain);
obj_arg = NULL_TREE;
}
which makes call a TARGET_EXPR with the dtor in TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP,
but then call cxx_constant_value on it. In cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr
it triggers the:
else if (TREE_CODE (t) != CONSTRUCTOR)
{
r = get_target_expr_sfinae (r, tf_warning_or_error | tf_no_cleanup);
TREE_CONSTANT (r) = true;
}
which wraps the CONSTRUCTOR r into a new TARGET_EXPR, but one without
dtors (I think we need e.g. the TREE_CONSTANT for the callers),
and finally build_over_call uses that.
The following patch fixes that by using get_target_expr instead
of get_target_expr_sfinae + TREE_CONSTANT (r) = true if t is
a TARGET_EXPR with non-NULL TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP.
2022-01-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/104055
* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): If t is a
TARGET_EXPR with TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP, use get_target_expr rather
than get_target_expr_sfinae with tf_no_cleanup, and don't set
TREE_CONSTANT.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval27.C: New test.
if (TREE_CODE (t) == TARGET_EXPR
&& TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (t) == r)
return t;
- else if (TREE_CODE (t) != CONSTRUCTOR)
+ else if (TREE_CODE (t) == CONSTRUCTOR)
+ ;
+ else if (TREE_CODE (t) == TARGET_EXPR && TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP (t))
+ r = get_target_expr (r);
+ else
{
r = get_target_expr_sfinae (r, tf_warning_or_error | tf_no_cleanup);
TREE_CONSTANT (r) = true;
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/104055
+// { dg-do run { target c++20 } }
+
+int g;
+
+struct A {
+ ~A () { if (a != 17 || b != 26) __builtin_abort (); g = 42; }
+ consteval A () : a (17), b (26) {}
+ int a, b;
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ A{};
+ if (g != 42)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+}