if (*rmapp)
__rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, false);
- if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- }
}
}
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access() and kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
+ * which do tlb flush out of mmu-lock should be serialized by
+ * kvm->slots_lock otherwise tlb flush would be missed.
+ */
+ lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * We can flush all the TLBs out of the mmu lock without TLB
+ * corruption since we just change the spte from writable to
+ * readonly so that we only need to care the case of changing
+ * spte from present to present (changing the spte from present
+ * to nonpresent will flush all the TLBs immediately), in other
+ * words, the only case we care is mmu_spte_update() where we
+ * haved checked SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE
+ * instead of PT_WRITABLE_MASK, that means it does not depend
+ * on PT_WRITABLE_MASK anymore.
+ */
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
}
#define BATCH_ZAP_PAGES 10
return pte & PT_PRESENT_MASK;
}
+/*
+ * Currently, we have two sorts of write-protection, a) the first one
+ * write-protects guest page to sync the guest modification, b) another one is
+ * used to sync dirty bitmap when we do KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG. The differences
+ * between these two sorts are:
+ * 1) the first case clears SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit.
+ * 2) the first case requires flushing tlb immediately avoiding corrupting
+ * shadow page table between all vcpus so it should be in the protection of
+ * mmu-lock. And the another case does not need to flush tlb until returning
+ * the dirty bitmap to userspace since it only write-protects the page
+ * logged in the bitmap, that means the page in the dirty bitmap is not
+ * missed, so it can flush tlb out of mmu-lock.
+ *
+ * So, there is the problem: the first case can meet the corrupted tlb caused
+ * by another case which write-protects pages but without flush tlb
+ * immediately. In order to making the first case be aware this problem we let
+ * it flush tlb if we try to write-protect a spte whose SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit
+ * is set, it works since another case never touches SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit.
+ *
+ * Anyway, whenever a spte is updated (only permission and status bits are
+ * changed) we need to check whether the spte with SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE becomes
+ * readonly, if that happens, we need to flush tlb. Fortunately,
+ * mmu_spte_update() has already handled it perfectly.
+ *
+ * The rules to use SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE and PT_WRITABLE_MASK:
+ * - if we want to see if it has writable tlb entry or if the spte can be
+ * writable on the mmu mapping, check SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE, this is the most
+ * case, otherwise
+ * - if we fix page fault on the spte or do write-protection by dirty logging,
+ * check PT_WRITABLE_MASK.
+ *
+ * TODO: introduce APIs to split these two cases.
+ */
static inline int is_writable_pte(unsigned long pte)
{
return pte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset, mask);
}
- if (is_dirty)
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ /* See the comments in kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(). */
+ lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * All the TLBs can be flushed out of mmu lock, see the comments in
+ * kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access().
+ */
+ if (is_dirty)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
r = -EFAULT;
if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, dirty_bitmap_buffer, n))
goto out;