s390/ptrace: fix PSW mask check
authorMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:29:40 +0000 (15:29 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:52:54 +0000 (12:52 -0700)
commit dab6cf55f81a6e16b8147aed9a843e1691dcd318 upstream.

The PSW mask check of the PTRACE_POKEUSR_AREA command is incorrect.
The PSW_MASK_USER define contains the PSW_MASK_ASC bits, the ptrace
interface accepts all combinations for the address-space-control
bits. To protect the kernel space the PSW mask check in ptrace needs
to reject the address-space-control bit combination for home space.

Fixes CVE-2014-3534

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c

index a48bc79..184d305 100644 (file)
@@ -323,9 +323,14 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data)
                        unsigned long mask = PSW_MASK_USER;
 
                        mask |= is_ri_task(child) ? PSW_MASK_RI : 0;
-                       if ((data & ~mask) != PSW_USER_BITS)
+                       if ((data ^ PSW_USER_BITS) & ~mask)
+                               /* Invalid psw mask. */
+                               return -EINVAL;
+                       if ((data & PSW_MASK_ASC) == PSW_ASC_HOME)
+                               /* Invalid address-space-control bits */
                                return -EINVAL;
                        if ((data & PSW_MASK_EA) && !(data & PSW_MASK_BA))
+                               /* Invalid addressing mode bits */
                                return -EINVAL;
                }
                *(addr_t *)((addr_t) &task_pt_regs(child)->psw + addr) = data;
@@ -661,9 +666,12 @@ static int __poke_user_compat(struct task_struct *child,
 
                        mask |= is_ri_task(child) ? PSW32_MASK_RI : 0;
                        /* Build a 64 bit psw mask from 31 bit mask. */
-                       if ((tmp & ~mask) != PSW32_USER_BITS)
+                       if ((tmp ^ PSW32_USER_BITS) & ~mask)
                                /* Invalid psw mask. */
                                return -EINVAL;
+                       if ((data & PSW32_MASK_ASC) == PSW32_ASC_HOME)
+                               /* Invalid address-space-control bits */
+                               return -EINVAL;
                        regs->psw.mask = (regs->psw.mask & ~PSW_MASK_USER) |
                                (regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_BA) |
                                (__u64)(tmp & mask) << 32;