Currently we're relying on suboptimal construct
for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) {
where aggregator is an argument of __get_active_agg() which is _always_ the
first slave's aggregator - judging by all the callers, comments in the
ad_agg_selection_logic() and by logic.
Convert it to use the standard bond_for_each_slave().
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
*/
static struct aggregator *__get_active_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator)
{
- struct aggregator *retval = NULL;
+ struct bonding *bond = aggregator->slave->bond;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct slave *slave;
- for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) {
- if (aggregator->is_active) {
- retval = aggregator;
- break;
- }
- }
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
+ if (SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator.is_active)
+ return &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator);
- return retval;
+ return NULL;
}
/**