NLM: Defend against file_lock changes after vfs_test_lock()
authorBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:40:06 +0000 (09:40 -0400)
committerChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:08:56 +0000 (20:08 -0400)
Instead of trusting that struct file_lock returns completely unchanged
after vfs_test_lock() when there's no conflicting lock, stash away our
nlm_lockowner reference so we can properly release it for all cases.

This defends against another file_lock implementation overwriting fl_owner
when the return type is F_UNLCK.

Reported-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
fs/lockd/svclock.c
fs/lockd/svcproc.c
include/linux/lockd/lockd.h

index 176b468..4f247ab 100644 (file)
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ __nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp)
        struct nlm_args *argp = rqstp->rq_argp;
        struct nlm_host *host;
        struct nlm_file *file;
+       struct nlm_lockowner *test_owner;
        __be32 rc = rpc_success;
 
        dprintk("lockd: TEST4        called\n");
@@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ __nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp)
        if ((resp->status = nlm4svc_retrieve_args(rqstp, argp, &host, &file)))
                return resp->status == nlm_drop_reply ? rpc_drop_reply :rpc_success;
 
+       test_owner = argp->lock.fl.fl_owner;
        /* Now check for conflicting locks */
        resp->status = nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, host, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie);
        if (resp->status == nlm_drop_reply)
@@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ __nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp)
        else
                dprintk("lockd: TEST4        status %d\n", ntohl(resp->status));
 
-       nlmsvc_release_lockowner(&argp->lock);
+       nlmsvc_put_lockowner(test_owner);
        nlmsvc_release_host(host);
        nlm_release_file(file);
        return rc;
index cb3658a..9c1aa75 100644 (file)
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ nlmsvc_get_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *lockowner)
        return lockowner;
 }
 
-static void nlmsvc_put_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *lockowner)
+void nlmsvc_put_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *lockowner)
 {
        if (!refcount_dec_and_lock(&lockowner->count, &lockowner->host->h_lock))
                return;
@@ -590,7 +590,6 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
        int                     error;
        int                     mode;
        __be32                  ret;
-       struct nlm_lockowner    *test_owner;
 
        dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_testlock(%s/%ld, ty=%d, %Ld-%Ld)\n",
                                nlmsvc_file_inode(file)->i_sb->s_id,
@@ -604,9 +603,6 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
                goto out;
        }
 
-       /* If there's a conflicting lock, remember to clean up the test lock */
-       test_owner = (struct nlm_lockowner *)lock->fl.fl_owner;
-
        mode = lock_to_openmode(&lock->fl);
        error = vfs_test_lock(file->f_file[mode], &lock->fl);
        if (error) {
@@ -635,10 +631,6 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
        conflock->fl.fl_end = lock->fl.fl_end;
        locks_release_private(&lock->fl);
 
-       /* Clean up the test lock */
-       lock->fl.fl_owner = NULL;
-       nlmsvc_put_lockowner(test_owner);
-
        ret = nlm_lck_denied;
 out:
        return ret;
index 4dc1b40..b09ca35 100644 (file)
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ __nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp)
        struct nlm_args *argp = rqstp->rq_argp;
        struct nlm_host *host;
        struct nlm_file *file;
+       struct nlm_lockowner *test_owner;
        __be32 rc = rpc_success;
 
        dprintk("lockd: TEST          called\n");
@@ -125,6 +126,8 @@ __nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp)
        if ((resp->status = nlmsvc_retrieve_args(rqstp, argp, &host, &file)))
                return resp->status == nlm_drop_reply ? rpc_drop_reply :rpc_success;
 
+       test_owner = argp->lock.fl.fl_owner;
+
        /* Now check for conflicting locks */
        resp->status = cast_status(nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, host, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie));
        if (resp->status == nlm_drop_reply)
@@ -133,7 +136,7 @@ __nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp)
                dprintk("lockd: TEST          status %d vers %d\n",
                        ntohl(resp->status), rqstp->rq_vers);
 
-       nlmsvc_release_lockowner(&argp->lock);
+       nlmsvc_put_lockowner(test_owner);
        nlmsvc_release_host(host);
        nlm_release_file(file);
        return rc;
index fcef192..70ce419 100644 (file)
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ void                  nlmsvc_locks_init_private(struct file_lock *, struct nlm_host *, pid_t);
 __be32           nlm_lookup_file(struct svc_rqst *, struct nlm_file **,
                                        struct nlm_lock *);
 void             nlm_release_file(struct nlm_file *);
+void             nlmsvc_put_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *);
 void             nlmsvc_release_lockowner(struct nlm_lock *);
 void             nlmsvc_mark_resources(struct net *);
 void             nlmsvc_free_host_resources(struct nlm_host *);