doc/user: reword one of the FAQ entries to no tmake it read outdated

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>

diff --git a/doc/user/faqs.rst b/doc/user/faqs.rst
index a6f5dee276be71a97cf17f07d23343862915f302..4de7a3fc44a3ecafac1633e555f8402bde3ae024 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/user/faqs.rst
+++ b/doc/user/faqs.rst
@@ -312,14 +312,13 @@ direct connection. As a technical analogy, the question is similar to "is
 glibc required for HTTP", or (stretching the analogy a bit further) "Is a
 pen required to write English". No, it isn't.
 
-You can use libinput without a Wayland compositor, you can
-write a Wayland compositor without libinput. Until 2018 the most common use
-of libinput is with the X.Org X server through the xf86-input-libinput
-driver. As Wayland compositors become more commonplace they will eventually
-overtake X.
+You can use libinput without a Wayland compositor, you can write a Wayland
+compositor without libinput. On most major distributions, libinput is the
+standard input stack used with the X.Org X server through the
+xf86-input-libinput driver.
 
 So why "for your use-case - probably"?  All general-purpose Wayland
-compositors use libinput for their input stack.  Wayland compositors that
+compositors use libinput for their input stack. Wayland compositors that
 are more specialized (e.g. in-vehicle infotainment or IVI) can handle input
 devices directly but the compositor you want to use
 on your desktop needs an input stack that is more complex. And right now,